¿El Reino Unido controla el clima a través de Geoingeniería?
In recent months, there has been a great deal of anticipation and confusion about whether the United Kingdom is deliberately taking actions to change the climate through innovative geoengineering techniques. This controversy arises following the announcement of new state investments in research related to intentional climate manipulation to combat climate change. Amidst citizen doubts and social media agitation, the question of whether the British are intervening in atmospheric time without transparency looms.
Essentially, geoengineering covers large-scale technological interventions aimed at mitigating the effects of climate change. While there are different forms of geoengineering, the UK is currently prioritizing the so-called Solar Radiation Management, which aims to reflect some of the sun’s light and heat back in an effort to cool the planet.
The UK government has allocated around 67 million euros for experimental projects focused on solar management. Among the proposed initiatives are the use of particles capable of diverting solar rays and the spraying of seawater into clouds, thereby increasing their reflectivity. These research efforts, supported by the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA), are in their early stages, and according to authorities, there will already be small controlled attempts at scale.
In addition to technological development, a central issue is establishing a framework that allows us to regulate geoengineering at an international level, as climate influence does not stop at national borders. The official intent, according to the government and scientific organizations, is to seek temporary solutions for slowing global warming while progressing towards more permanent strategies.
Rumors, conspiracies, and social debates abound despite institutions insisting on the transparency and experimental nature of the proposed actions. Online platforms have proliferated theories suggesting that authorities are already conducting large-scale geoengineering tests without public knowledge. Of particular note is the Chemtrails theory, which argues that visible aircraft trails contain chemicals intentionally sprayed on the population. Although repeatedly discredited, this theory persists whenever news about geoengineering surfaces.
Experts like Jim Franke from the University of Chicago emphasize that conducting massive atmospheric manipulations in secret is practically impossible. The resources required, such as aircraft fleets and specialized materials, would be easily identifiable by scientists and international organizations. Similarly, Wolfgang Cramer, a professor of global ecology, insists that existing experiments have always been punctual and public, and attributing ill intentions to these projects lacks a solid foundation.
Technical and potential risks are significant with Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and geoengineering in general. Concerns include the diversion of resources from reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the primary cause of global warming, and uncertainties about governing and supervising these technologies. The theoretical implementation of SRM would require a robust and stable international organization capable of maintaining the project for decades. Side effects could disrupt the hydrological cycle, leading to regional rainfall reductions and unforeseen impacts on ecosystems and agriculture.
Computer models suggest that moderate interventions could reduce certain climate risks such as heatwaves, coastal erosion, or thawing. However, experts emphasize the need for further research before real-world applications are pursued.
Are there any indications of climate manipulation in the UK? Consulted specialists agree that there is no reliable evidence indicating secret or massive climate changes in the UK. Most research has been publicly documented, and results are shared in recognized scientific and academic forums. Comparisons with techniques like cloud seeding used in some countries to stimulate rain are not valid, as solar geoengineering involves global and long-term processes. Scientists stress that current experiments are limited and supervised, aimed at understanding possibilities and risks before decisions that could impact the entire planet are made.
It is crucial to emphasize that controversies surrounding geoengineering will continue to escalate as the debate on addressing climate emergencies intensifies. For now, what is being done in the UK is nothing more than preliminary research under strict supervision, far from the hidden manipulation scenarios that often circulate online.
FUENTE
